The security threats posed by RFID chips have been known for
some time. However, the federal
government has yet to pass any laws regarding RFID chips. As awareness of privacy concerns has
increased, some states have taken privacy measures into their own hands. For example, Arkansas passed a law in 2009
making it illegal to put an RFID chip into driver’s licenses or any other
identification card. California has a
law making it illegal to read a person’s RFID chip without their knowledge or
consent. Rhode Island passed a law in
2010 that protects personally identifiable information of persons who use
toll payment devices that contain RFID chips.
So, what has been done in our state regarding RFID chips?
In 2007, Washington passed RCW 46.20.202. This bill is
in regards to the RFID chips in Enhanced Driver’s Licenses. The bill states:
“…The enhanced driver's license or
identicard must include reasonable security measures to protect the privacy of
Washington state residents, including reasonable safeguards to protect against
unauthorized disclosure of data about Washington state residents. If the
enhanced driver's license or identicard includes a radio frequency
identification chip, or similar technology, the department shall ensure that
the technology is encrypted or otherwise secure from unauthorized data access. From
time to time the department shall review technological innovations related to
the security of identity cards and amend the rules related to enhanced driver's
licenses and identicards as the director deems consistent with this section and
appropriate to protect the privacy of Washington state residents.”
This ensures that the chips used in the Enhanced Driver’s
Licenses will include encryption in an attempt to protect the information
stored on the RFID chip. However, the
encryption of information alone is not enough to stop data thieves or other
illegitimate parties from reading the information. This led to the creation of House Bill 1031
in 2008. This law states: “A person that
intentionally scans another person's identification device remotely, without that
person's prior knowledge and prior consent, for the purpose of fraud, identity
theft, or for any other illegal purpose, shall be guilty of a class C felony.” This legislation is important because it
actually makes it a felony for people to scan RDIF chips without the owner’s knowledge.
Additionally, in 2009, Washington State passed House Bill
1011, which prohibits the scanning of RFID tags by anyone except for the
business or agency that issued the tag.
This bill does list some exceptions, including when the scanning is part
of a sales transaction initiated by the tag holder, or data from
an individual's identification device is remotely read or stored in the
course of an act of good-faith security research. These exceptions largely are due to the fact
that stakeholder groups including retailers and RFID technology
vendors lobby the legislation that restricts RFID chips.
I am glad to live in a State where these
types of laws exist to protect the information that is unknowingly stored on
RFID chips. However, when is the federal
government going to start taking action to protect people’s privacy on RFID
chips?
Sources:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2007-08/Pdf/Bills/House%20Passed%20Legislature/1031-S.PL.pdf
http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4802
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/03/prweb803114.htm
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/telecom/radio-frequency-identification-rfid-privacy-laws.aspx
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=46.20.202
It doesn't surprise me that the federal government hasn't passed a single law concerning RFID security and privacy. Simply put, federal laws have not caught up to the technology yet and until RFID fraud becomes widespread and everyone’s privacy will be at risk, don’t expect federal action to come anytime soon.
ReplyDeleteI am glad to live in the state of Washington where RFID laws are arguably the strongest in the nation. Most states have no legislation whatsoever, and current laws in other states are too narrow in scope to cover every form of potential RFID fraud. I am confident that RFIDs will gain more attention at the state and national level, and more comprehensive legislation will be implemented to deal with its issues.